Follow Us!

Search Truth about Diamonds

Click to Watch Us on Anderson Cooper

Jun
22

Diamond Cut Quality

Posted by: | Comments (290)

If you’re searching for the perfect diamond, then please contact me, and let me know your budget and what you’re looking for. I’ll sift through hundreds of thousands of diamonds online from vendors like James Allen and Blue Nile, and find the perfect stone for you and your budget. Unlike the other sites, I’m not looking to sell you anything – my advice is objective and in your best interest.  You have nothing to lose and a larger diamond or saving hundreds of dollars to gain.


Bottom Line Recommendation:

  • Diamond Cut Grade: For GIA Certified Diamonds, a cut grade of “Very Good” will look great.  You will, however, be able to notice an improvement in brilliance by upgrading to “Excellent.”  For AGS Certified Diamonds, a cut grade of “Excellent” will suffice, but you will notice added brilliance by upgrading to “Ideal”
  • “Triple Excellent” or “Triple Zero” look pretty on paper, but you shouldn’t pay extra for Excellent (or AGS Ideal) Polish or Symmetry.  You cannot detect the difference between Good (AGS Very Good) Polish and Symmetry and Excellent (AGS Ideal) Polish and Symmetry with your naked eye.  In most cases you need a microscope to detect the difference.
  • For Round Brilliant Cut Diamonds, don’t give too much credence to an online vendor’s cut grade.   Only focus on the GIA or AGS cut grade on the certificate.

Diamond Cut – a Definition

Diamond Cut refers to how well proportioned the diamond is.  For example, what percentage of a diamonds diameter is its depth?  What are its various angles and how do they interact with one another?  While these may seem like esoteric questions, these are the essential factors that determine how beautiful your diamond will be.  For a great visual representation of why these issues matter, have a look at James Allen’s page on Diamond Cut.

Diamond Cut Grade — All that Matters

Until January 1st, 2006, you basically had two options when it came to diamond cut grade.  You could either buy a diamond with an AGS certificate and trust their diamond cut grading system, or you could learn about the various proportions of diamond cut and trust your own eduction about what numbers translated into a beautiful diamond.  On that day, though, the GIA introduced a new certificate format that included their very own diamond cut grade.  They claim that their Diamond Cut Grade system is based on 15 years of research testing and retesting different combinations of measurements with real life light performance tests.  ags_ogi_reportAs opposed to the old AGS system which simply defined what an “ideal” diamond is and then gives lower grades the farther away from that “ideal” the parameters are (see table to the left), the GIA system does not have any one single definition of perfection.  They claim that in their research various differing combinations of proportions equally produced diamonds that reflected the most light.  So while in the old AGS model, a diamond with a table size of 60% is automatically penalized to a Diamond Cut Grade of “2,” (on a scale from 0 to 9), with the GIA model, there’s still a chance the diamond could receive an “Excellent” grade if the rest of the parameters are the best possible parameters that combine with a 60% table.

To be fair, in the middle of 2005, AGS also realized that their way of doing things was antiquated.  So beginning on June 1st, the AGS lab began offering its certificates with a new light performance-based cut grade.  As it would turn out, though, this new method made it even more difficult for stones to receive the coveted “Ideal” grade for cut.  Thus, when the GIA cut grade was released a half a year later with its more elegant solution, AGS lost much market share to the GIA.

Realizing their error and almost facing extinction, the AGS lab in 2008 decided to copy the GIA and began offering a “new” proportions based cut grade.  I write “new” in quotation marks because, really, there was nothing new about it.  The AGS cut grade prior to 2005 had always been proportions based.  They simply re-introduced it, just this time with more flexibility. They made the smart decision to mimic the GIA and award Ideal cut grades to different non-concentric combinations of proportions.

In my opinion, the GIA & AGS systems are clearly a much more elegant solution to the question of what cut proportions produce the most beautiful diamonds.  And the fact is, it’s a more elegant solution than your typical diamond dealer’s instincts, as well.  What I mean is, before GIA introduced their cut grade, most diamond dealers thought about cut grade the same way the AGS did.  They had in their mind what was the perfect set of parameters, and basically, diamonds got uglier the further they strayed from that ideal.  This revelation of how GIA Diamond Cut Grade worked was a boon to diamond manufacturers as well.  Now, the cutters had more options when assessing a piece of rough for cutting.  If a diamond with a 57% sized table couldn’t fit into a certain piece of rough and still maintain the weight category, then they could try a diamond with a 60% table and see if that would maintain the weight.

For those of you looking to buy a diamond without a certificate, here’s a very dumbed-down, but reliable rule of thumb.  Just remember “60/60.”  That means 60% table and 60% total depth.  While this falls out of the “0″ and “1″ cut grade of the old AGS standard, it is the basic rule of thumb that diamond dealers always use.  You can allow for about 2% plus or minus from the 60%, and make sure the girdle size is either thin or medium, but not thick.  With these simple rules, you can be assured you will end up with a very beautiful diamond.

If you have any questions, please post them in the comments below.  I will usually respond within 24 hours.

Related posts:

  1. Taking The Diamond Quality Challenge on the Street in Times Square NYC!
  2. Q&A: How to Get the Same Quality as Hearts on Fire (HOF) for a Fraction of the Cost
  3. Dude, if You’re Gonna Steal, at Least go for Quality
  4. AGS
  5. Diamond Symmetry

Comments

  1. Mike says:

    I checked the same diamond on both Brian Gavin and James Allen and Brian Gavin had a lower price?

  2. Julia Merrit says:

    My engagement ring is beautiful but I think I am expecting more fire to it. Am I expecting too much? It looks like crushed ice but no real movement to it. Is this the nature of the cut or is something not great with my stone? Again, it is beautiful, just not a lot of fire. No blinding shimmers like off of my moms flawless one carat brilliant.

    2.07 carat Cushion Modified Brilliant
    7.30 x 7.04 x 4.54
    Color – F
    Clarity VVS1
    Total depth 64%
    Table size 63%
    Girdle: Thick to Very thick, faceted
    Culet – None
    Polish – Excellent
    Symmetry – Very good
    Flourescence – None

    It meets a lot of the criterea of a good stone other than the Girdle which I understand should not be so thick… or faceted.

    I can still exchange it so any comments would be appreciated.

    Thank you.

    Julia Merritt

  3. Jay says:

    Hi Mike. Thanks for the incredible education. Now I know just enough to be dangerous! Hopefully my questions and your answers, if you are kind enough to respond to this post, will be educational for us all.

    A reputable local diamond wholesaler/jeweler offered the following stone for the center stone of a 3-stone engagement ring:

    GIA certified in 2011, round brilliant 1.04 carat G-SI1
    6.43-6.46 x 4.06mm
    Excellent polish and symmetry
    Faint fluorescence
    Table 56%; crown depth 16.5%; crown angle 36.5 deg (too steep?); upper crown facet 45%
    Girdle medium to slightly thick (faceted) 3.5%
    Total depth to diameter ratio 62.9%
    Pavilion depth 43%;angle 40.8 deg
    Pavilion facet 75%
    No culet
    Diagrams show small cloud and crystal in table; other inclusions in crown facets or pavilion facets, with additional comments stating additional clouds not shown. Laser inscribed.
    Diamond is offered at $7200.

    Side stones:

    GIA certified 2003, round brilliant 5.05-5.09 x 3.14mm, 0.50 carat, G-VS2
    Depth 61.9%; Table 60%; Girdle slightly thick, faceted; no culet; excellent polish; excellent symmetry; clarity VS2 ; characteristics crystal, feather; fluorescence none; comments none. Offered at $1800. (I am assuming no cut grade given as this report was issued in 2003?) No reference diagrams. Laser inscribed.

    GIA certified 2003, round brilliant 5.08-5.10 x 3.15mm, 0.50 carat, G-VS1
    Depth 61.9%; Table 57%; Girdle medium, faceted; no culet; very good polish; excellent symmetry;; clarity VS1; characteristics crystal, cloud; fluorescence none; comments none. No reference diagrams. Laser inscribed. Offered at $2150.

    These will be set in a platinum ring which the jeweler says he is giving me basically at his cost of $1000, so “all in” is $12,150 cash price, plus I need to add in sales tax.

    Busts my budget of $10,000, but maybe this isn’t reasonable for stones with these parameters. Ring looks great with these stones, naked eye.

    Please advise. Can I do better for this amount? Is this a good value? Can I do as well and stay within my $10,000 total budget (or less?).

    Thanks!

    Jay

  4. Kevin says:

    Hi Mike

    Love the site, lots of great info, I’ve found these two which i’m considering of buying.

    A) – 0.8 F/IF tri-EX GIA certed, for $7k

    http://certs.rapnet.com/userfolders/68276/Certs/6127794243.jpg

    or

    B) – 1.23 F/VVS2 tri-EX GIA certed for $9.2k
    http://certs.rapnet.com/userfolders/19106/Certs/2126874802.jpg

    Any thoughts?

    Appreciated heaps!

    • Mike says:

      I suggest reading our post on clarity (make sure to check out the video). I think you are vastly overpaying for something that you can’t see with your naked eye. You are better off getting an eye-clean SI from a site that offers photos (or from a store, though they are usually more expensive).

Leave a Reply

Tell Google you Like us!